<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom 2 and Photoshop CS3: Stitching a Panorama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/</link>
	<description>Keeping photography enthusiasts informed, and enthused about the art, science, and magic of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:01:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-25714</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-25714</guid>
		<description>Hei, me again. Seems that prost processing reinforces/reveals the seams. I&#039;ll try Lightrooming/batching the raws before Photoshopping/merging them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hei, me again. Seems that prost processing reinforces/reveals the seams. I&#8217;ll try Lightrooming/batching the raws before Photoshopping/merging them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-25713</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-25713</guid>
		<description>Hi !

I&#039; starting making panoramas and am looking for the &quot;easiest&quot; way to get good ones. I tried photosticht which leaves a lot of artifatcs, and tried today with your method. After some time (slow PC) I was astonished by the almost seamless panorama that was processed, considereing that I shot a large residential / urban area from a hilltop. Unfortunately, CS4 did a shitty job on the sky and the top of the pictures, where Photostich made a perfect job :(.

I will try to play with the layers and the erase brush next time but I kinda suck at post processing... I downloaded a trial version of CS4 just to try that. I&#039;m more into Lightroom.

Here is the pano, from 12 pictures, 1/3 overlap, M-mode, M-awb...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/skygge/4370613545/

Thanks for the video anyways, seems you got lucky with this shot in full auto !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi !</p>
<p>I&#8217; starting making panoramas and am looking for the &#8220;easiest&#8221; way to get good ones. I tried photosticht which leaves a lot of artifatcs, and tried today with your method. After some time (slow PC) I was astonished by the almost seamless panorama that was processed, considereing that I shot a large residential / urban area from a hilltop. Unfortunately, CS4 did a shitty job on the sky and the top of the pictures, where Photostich made a perfect job <img src='http://frederickvan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>I will try to play with the layers and the erase brush next time but I kinda suck at post processing&#8230; I downloaded a trial version of CS4 just to try that. I&#8217;m more into Lightroom.</p>
<p>Here is the pano, from 12 pictures, 1/3 overlap, M-mode, M-awb&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/skygge/4370613545/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/skygge/4370613545/</a></p>
<p>Thanks for the video anyways, seems you got lucky with this shot in full auto !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Barnes</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-20195</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-20195</guid>
		<description>Nice informative tutorial, but it didn&#039;t work well at all for me. I have Lightroom 2.5 and CS3 v.10.0.1. I tried to do this with 8 sequential photos (as JPG) I took of the Columbia River Gorge here in Hood River, OR. I used a tripod and gave each photo about 1/3 overlap. I followed your instructions to the letter and yet I ended up half the photos (the first four) not showing up in the final at all. In CS3 I can see the first four layers completely black, yet the first two layers have Mount Hood prominently in them, which none of the other layers have. Any ideas? I could send you my photos to see for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice informative tutorial, but it didn&#8217;t work well at all for me. I have Lightroom 2.5 and CS3 v.10.0.1. I tried to do this with 8 sequential photos (as JPG) I took of the Columbia River Gorge here in Hood River, OR. I used a tripod and gave each photo about 1/3 overlap. I followed your instructions to the letter and yet I ended up half the photos (the first four) not showing up in the final at all. In CS3 I can see the first four layers completely black, yet the first two layers have Mount Hood prominently in them, which none of the other layers have. Any ideas? I could send you my photos to see for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-18239</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-18239</guid>
		<description>Very nice tutorial. Sometimes when I stitch one of the 5 or 6 photos gets left out for manual insertion. When I do manually insert the exposure isn&#039;t corrected, even as a finished panoramic (post-advance blending). Any tips to fix this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice tutorial. Sometimes when I stitch one of the 5 or 6 photos gets left out for manual insertion. When I do manually insert the exposure isn&#8217;t corrected, even as a finished panoramic (post-advance blending). Any tips to fix this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominique</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-14701</link>
		<dc:creator>dominique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-14701</guid>
		<description>Fabulous - thanks!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabulous &#8211; thanks!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzy Walker</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-14656</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzy Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-14656</guid>
		<description>Hi Frederick, 

Just watched this vid because I&#039;m new to lightroom and usually open my raw files from bridge then into photoshop. When I go from Bridge it works but when I go from LR the same raws refuse to create a pano. They load into PS3 but it tells me my images cannot be auto aligned. Do you know why it would be using a different script to bridge? Is it my camera raw version do you think?

Many thanks
Suzy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frederick, </p>
<p>Just watched this vid because I&#8217;m new to lightroom and usually open my raw files from bridge then into photoshop. When I go from Bridge it works but when I go from LR the same raws refuse to create a pano. They load into PS3 but it tells me my images cannot be auto aligned. Do you know why it would be using a different script to bridge? Is it my camera raw version do you think?</p>
<p>Many thanks<br />
Suzy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jilske &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No more pano(d)ramas in Lightroom 2</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-10709</link>
		<dc:creator>jilske &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No more pano(d)ramas in Lightroom 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-10709</guid>
		<description>[...] a detailed explanation, check this video here. But really it is as simple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a detailed explanation, check this video here. But really it is as simple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Worthington</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7323</link>
		<dc:creator>John Worthington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7323</guid>
		<description>Thank you sir.

Also, I have found that by zooming in a little when composing the shot, it can avoid a bit of the buldging that occurs with thoses objects closer to you (like the ground or stray trees).

Especially when shooting a beach or anything past the 160 degree mark, what should be a vast horizion (sea) gets mashed into a u shape while the ends of the beach get stretched our of proportion.

Example from the weekend: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2377/2488863680_c2f93ba56b_o_d.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you sir.</p>
<p>Also, I have found that by zooming in a little when composing the shot, it can avoid a bit of the buldging that occurs with thoses objects closer to you (like the ground or stray trees).</p>
<p>Especially when shooting a beach or anything past the 160 degree mark, what should be a vast horizion (sea) gets mashed into a u shape while the ends of the beach get stretched our of proportion.</p>
<p>Example from the weekend: <a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2377/2488863680_c2f93ba56b_o_d.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2377/2488863680_c2f93ba56b_o_d.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7322</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7322</guid>
		<description>Hey John,

In Lightroom&#039;s preferences you can set the default external file format to either TIFF or PSD. Both are &quot;lossless&quot;, both support channels and layers. Photoshop of course additionally supports smart objects and adjustment layers as well. 

So, since quality is not a question between PSD and TIFF, the choice becomes a bit subjective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John,</p>
<p>In Lightroom&#8217;s preferences you can set the default external file format to either TIFF or PSD. Both are &#8220;lossless&#8221;, both support channels and layers. Photoshop of course additionally supports smart objects and adjustment layers as well. </p>
<p>So, since quality is not a question between PSD and TIFF, the choice becomes a bit subjective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Worthington</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7321</link>
		<dc:creator>John Worthington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7321</guid>
		<description>Just a quick thing.

What is the best format to bring the pano back into LightRoom?

The few Panos I have tried have always put me back with a TIFF.

In the past I have always gone for PSD. Is there a quality difference between TIFF or PSD?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick thing.</p>
<p>What is the best format to bring the pano back into LightRoom?</p>
<p>The few Panos I have tried have always put me back with a TIFF.</p>
<p>In the past I have always gone for PSD. Is there a quality difference between TIFF or PSD?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ado</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7311</link>
		<dc:creator>Ado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7311</guid>
		<description>Hey this is awesome, thanks a lot Im gonna go try this out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey this is awesome, thanks a lot Im gonna go try this out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7150</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 02:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7150</guid>
		<description>@TimB &amp; @Yves,

Looks like you solved the mystery... As you&#039;ve found out, you&#039;ll need to running Photoshop CS3 10.0.1 (or later) for the Lightroom 2 integration to work. Hopefully we&#039;ll make this a little more obvious when the app is officially released.

Let me know how things work out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TimB &#038; @Yves,</p>
<p>Looks like you solved the mystery&#8230; As you&#8217;ve found out, you&#8217;ll need to running Photoshop CS3 10.0.1 (or later) for the Lightroom 2 integration to work. Hopefully we&#8217;ll make this a little more obvious when the app is officially released.</p>
<p>Let me know how things work out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7146</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 12:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7146</guid>
		<description>Problem solved. After updating Photoshop CS3 to version 10.0.1 it works. Seems like I had my auto update turned off for some reason. Would be nice though if Lightroom would handle this situation a bit more gracefully or informative :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem solved. After updating Photoshop CS3 to version 10.0.1 it works. Seems like I had my auto update turned off for some reason. Would be nice though if Lightroom would handle this situation a bit more gracefully or informative <img src='http://frederickvan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7140</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7140</guid>
		<description>@Tim, I see your point. I don&#039;t think this is the case, because I am using CS3 Extended! I hope Frederick can shed some light on this as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim, I see your point. I don&#8217;t think this is the case, because I am using CS3 Extended! I hope Frederick can shed some light on this as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimB</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7139</link>
		<dc:creator>TimB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7139</guid>
		<description>@Yves

Yes, that&#039;s why I asked the questions I did. I get the same greyed-out options. I have a feeling we may need CS3 Extended for this to work, hopefully The Man will respond with an answer.

Cheers, Tim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yves</p>
<p>Yes, that&#8217;s why I asked the questions I did. I get the same greyed-out options. I have a feeling we may need CS3 Extended for this to work, hopefully The Man will respond with an answer.</p>
<p>Cheers, Tim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yves</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7138</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7138</guid>
		<description>Hey Frederick, this is strange. I have Lightroom 2.0 Beta installed with a clean new catalog with just 24 pictures in it (a 12 shot panorama with two exposures per shot). I also have Photoshop CS3 installed. I can chose Edit in Photoshop CS3, but all sub-options are disabled (Merge to HDR, Merge to Panorama, etc) even though I have several shots selected when I chose the options.

I tried this with RAW shots (.CR2) and with exported JPEGs as well. Neither worked. The same holds for selecting 2, 3, 5 or 10 shots. The options stay disabled. I also seem to have lost the possibility of stacking photos in Lightroom 2.0, because that setting is also disabled.

Is there something special you need to do to enable this functionality? I am on Leopard 10.5.2 if that helps. 

Thanks for taking the time to do a video for us!

Regards,
Yves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Frederick, this is strange. I have Lightroom 2.0 Beta installed with a clean new catalog with just 24 pictures in it (a 12 shot panorama with two exposures per shot). I also have Photoshop CS3 installed. I can chose Edit in Photoshop CS3, but all sub-options are disabled (Merge to HDR, Merge to Panorama, etc) even though I have several shots selected when I chose the options.</p>
<p>I tried this with RAW shots (.CR2) and with exported JPEGs as well. Neither worked. The same holds for selecting 2, 3, 5 or 10 shots. The options stay disabled. I also seem to have lost the possibility of stacking photos in Lightroom 2.0, because that setting is also disabled.</p>
<p>Is there something special you need to do to enable this functionality? I am on Leopard 10.5.2 if that helps. </p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to do a video for us!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Yves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimB</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7130</link>
		<dc:creator>TimB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7130</guid>
		<description>Great tutorial. Are these linked features only available if you have PS3 -E and LR2?

Cheers, Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tutorial. Are these linked features only available if you have PS3 -E and LR2?</p>
<p>Cheers, Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/04/lightroom-2-and-photoshop-cs3-stitching-a-panorama/comment-page-1/#comment-7007</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/?p=143#comment-7007</guid>
		<description>Crazy magic again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy magic again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
