<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary 1984</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frederickvan.com/2008/01/hillary-1984/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/01/hillary-1984/</link>
	<description>Keeping photography enthusiasts informed, and enthused about the art, science, and magic of photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:02:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/01/hillary-1984/comment-page-1/#comment-5287</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/2008/01/27/hillary-1984/#comment-5287</guid>
		<description>The reason there will be few to none Clinton anti Obama ads is anyone who would vote for her is to old or too stupid to operate a computer capable of building such an ad. She&#039;s finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason there will be few to none Clinton anti Obama ads is anyone who would vote for her is to old or too stupid to operate a computer capable of building such an ad. She&#8217;s finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/01/hillary-1984/comment-page-1/#comment-4528</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/2008/01/27/hillary-1984/#comment-4528</guid>
		<description>A huge upside to all this citizen-produce propaganda is simply awareness. The fact that our people care enough to create content like this really tells you how much more involved we&#039;re becoming in our politics. Is that a result purely of technology (easier to access, etc), or is it mainly because we&#039;re so fed up with &quot;politics as usual&quot;, or a combination of the two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A huge upside to all this citizen-produce propaganda is simply awareness. The fact that our people care enough to create content like this really tells you how much more involved we&#8217;re becoming in our politics. Is that a result purely of technology (easier to access, etc), or is it mainly because we&#8217;re so fed up with &#8220;politics as usual&#8221;, or a combination of the two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/01/hillary-1984/comment-page-1/#comment-4476</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/2008/01/27/hillary-1984/#comment-4476</guid>
		<description>Good post, Frederick. Interesting how &quot;citizen journalist&quot; with a website has evolved into &quot;citizen campaign booster&quot; with YouTube, and that is likely only part of the bigger picture. Nearing total media deconstruction. A lack of definable bounds between art and news and advertising -- push vs. pull. It&#039;s amusing to consider the hubbub over 80s product placement efforts in films (see E.T.) in this light. 

Poor, poor David Elton, it must be so hard being you. I can&#039;t imagine what day-to-day life must be like without the ability to think abstractly. You completely glossed over (and missed?) Frederick&#039;s explicit point, although clearly caught the implicit pro-Obama angle. If you&#039;re paying for the ad, posting the message, displaying the video, isn&#039;t it &quot;fair&quot; that you should be able to slant it wherever and however much you want? 

Following your logic, and considering recent talk about who is most like Reagan and who isn&#039;t, shouldn&#039;t the Widow Nancy be invited to the next debate to respond on Ronnie&#039;s behalf? And if she didn&#039;t want to respond, would the debate still be a &quot;fair debate&quot;, the dialog still &quot;balanced&quot;? 

And since when did we find it acceptable (again) for a couple of very-wealthy white Southerners to gang up against a man of color, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Frederick. Interesting how &#8220;citizen journalist&#8221; with a website has evolved into &#8220;citizen campaign booster&#8221; with YouTube, and that is likely only part of the bigger picture. Nearing total media deconstruction. A lack of definable bounds between art and news and advertising &#8212; push vs. pull. It&#8217;s amusing to consider the hubbub over 80s product placement efforts in films (see E.T.) in this light. </p>
<p>Poor, poor David Elton, it must be so hard being you. I can&#8217;t imagine what day-to-day life must be like without the ability to think abstractly. You completely glossed over (and missed?) Frederick&#8217;s explicit point, although clearly caught the implicit pro-Obama angle. If you&#8217;re paying for the ad, posting the message, displaying the video, isn&#8217;t it &#8220;fair&#8221; that you should be able to slant it wherever and however much you want? </p>
<p>Following your logic, and considering recent talk about who is most like Reagan and who isn&#8217;t, shouldn&#8217;t the Widow Nancy be invited to the next debate to respond on Ronnie&#8217;s behalf? And if she didn&#8217;t want to respond, would the debate still be a &#8220;fair debate&#8221;, the dialog still &#8220;balanced&#8221;? </p>
<p>And since when did we find it acceptable (again) for a couple of very-wealthy white Southerners to gang up against a man of color, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederick</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/01/hillary-1984/comment-page-1/#comment-4456</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 09:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/2008/01/27/hillary-1984/#comment-4456</guid>
		<description>Labour... ouch.

&quot;Fair &amp; Balanced&quot; Fox News does good job of balancing the Internet attack ads on Hillary.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL--ms&amp;NR=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour&#8230; ouch.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fair &#038; Balanced&#8221; Fox News does good job of balancing the Internet attack ads on Hillary.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL--ms&#038;NR=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL&#8211;ms&#038;NR=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Elton</title>
		<link>http://frederickvan.com/2008/01/hillary-1984/comment-page-1/#comment-4455</link>
		<dc:creator>David Elton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 09:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frederickvan.com/blog/2008/01/27/hillary-1984/#comment-4455</guid>
		<description>So the political smear campaign has begun! There&#039;s no doubt the internet is now the most influential tool out there. I&#039;ve been living back in the UK since 2004 so I don&#039;t get to see the full TV version of the Presidential Campaign anymore. Do you know of a simular unofficial video from Hilary&#039;s camp? It would definately give this post a &#039;balance&#039;. Meanwhile I have to put up with the UK&#039;s useless Labour government Labour - A long drawnout painfull process that usually ends in tears!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the political smear campaign has begun! There&#8217;s no doubt the internet is now the most influential tool out there. I&#8217;ve been living back in the UK since 2004 so I don&#8217;t get to see the full TV version of the Presidential Campaign anymore. Do you know of a simular unofficial video from Hilary&#8217;s camp? It would definately give this post a &#8216;balance&#8217;. Meanwhile I have to put up with the UK&#8217;s useless Labour government Labour &#8211; A long drawnout painfull process that usually ends in tears!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
